COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding two contradictory ideas simultaneously. The "ideas" or "cognition's" in question may include attitudes and beliefs, the awareness of one's behavior, and facts. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, or by justifying or rationalizing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.[1] Cognitive dissonance theory is one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology.
What if a person goes through life as a Christian and converts to Islam and then takes up Jihad and kills Christians for his new God?
The old saying, “If you tell a lie enough times it becomes a truth”, goes along way to explain why things are societies attitudes have changed over the years. This is an example of people changing their lifestyle because they have not questioned new laws or socially accepted norms such as Global Warming and being Politically Correct.
When a person acts out of the perceived “norm” and people accept these actions in this time in history when they would not have 100 years ago is an example of what I call Camouflaged Change. Years past it would be unacceptable for men to wear shorts in public yet even in the middle of Winter men are seen wearing shorts. Several years ago the military instituted ,"Don't ask Don't tell policy concerning being a Gay or homosexual in the military. Over the years the fact a person is Gay no longer has the sting socially as it once did but the military policy still holds. At the same time a person can be any religion in the military even a Jihadist Islamic Terrorist and no one will demand these people be discharged from the military as they do with Homosexuals. The major difference here is that I have never heard of a homosexual gunning down unarmed people while screaming God is Great in Arabic. But then according to the president of Iran there is no such thing as a Gay Muslim.
Some people are saying about the Army Major who gunned down all those people at Fort Hood as being mentally unbalanced and he simply snapped. If this person who committed this Terrorist act at Fort Hood, Texas had strapped a bomb around his waste and blew himself up instead of using a gun who there still be people who would question his motives?

November 6, 2009, Anxiety
Fort Hood Exit Strategy: The Cognitive Dissonance of a Military Psychiatrist
Firing a gun at Fort Hood was an exit strategy.

With the recent tragedy at Fort Hood, the time has come to face up to two facts:
War is Hell-this we know.

War is not conducive to mental health.
This we don't want to realize.
And it may be that if a little war is bad for one's mental state, a whole lot of war is a whole lot worse.
Leaving aside the merits of any particular war, and more detailed information about Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the 39-year-old man accused of Thursday's mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, it's easy to imagine how any one of any background would feel terrified and entrapped under the following conditions: • Possessing first hand knowledge of the combat experience and the severe mental damage it inflicts upon deployed military
• Facing deployment, (and unlike other military heading into deployment), having prior knowledge of the hazard to one's mental health and psychological status
Related Articles
· What Can We Learn from the Killer at Fort Hood?
· Murder and Mayhem at Fort Hood: Post-traumatic Embitterment, Madness, or Political Terrorism?
· PTSD in the Military: An Interview of a Military Wife
· Massacre at Fort Hood
· The Ft. Hood Killer - Guilty But Not Evil

It's safe to say that the majority of those facing deployment, have no real clue what they are in for. But Major Hasan undoubtedly did. Further he,
• Received his medical and psychiatric training as a military officer• Was therefore beholden to the military for the cost of that training• Had no way to leave the military
As heinous and reprehensible as were his actions, correctly or mistakenly, Hasan saw no way out of the military, no way out of his deployment. Firing a gun was his exit strategy.
I am sure that soon all the "bad apple" stories will briskly circulate. But before they do, let's ask: Isn't it possible that being a military psychiatrist could readily induce outsized cognitive dissonance in just about anyone?
Cold, calculating, numb, sedated, and murderous. Bonded first and foremost to comrades in arms. Is this a prescription for mental health, a solid marriage, successful parenting, or even a good night's sleep? Of course not. But these are the traits cultivated and inculcated in servicemen heading to battle.
Upon returning they can change into civilian clothes, but they can't so easily shed their traumatized neurology. For many, the military becomes a form of life long entrapment, a club that once joined, can't so easily be left behind, for economic, social, and psychological reasons.
By definition, a military psychiatrist is under military authority-- is that a conducive environment for building therapeutic trust?
A couple of months back, I attended a program lead by a military specialist in treating returning military suffering from psychological distress. First of all, it was evident that this specialist was himself traumatized. Empathy was for sissies. Maintaining the military code was more important than facing up to the pain. PTSD, he claimed, could be dealt with by a change of attitude.
"Just snap out of it," he told us he exhorted his clients.
This "expert" didn't want to call a spade a spade. He didn't want to call it post-traumatic stress. He wanted to call it "combat stress." That was more manly. In fact, the entire thrust of his therapeutic approach could be captured in a single sentence: "Figure out a treatment approach that conforms to military codes, and is palatable to higher ups, so that we don't have to admit the immense psychological damage."
I can't say for sure that this attitude is endemic to military psychiatry. I hope not, and would welcome hearing about places where good work is being done. I'm sure that there are numerous mental health professionals in the military who do a lot of good. I know that work with guided imagery has been proven successful with CDS available at www.healthjourneys.com
But the basic problem is that when you train people to be eternally hypervigilant, bond them as one in a killing group, put them through traumatizing experiences, and then upon their return signal that retaining the military code is more important than their personal mental health, then I can guarantee you several things:• They will know that they are not safe in receiving mental health treatments you offer• They won't easily find their way to helpful treatments for fear they violate their military code and bonds with their fellow officers• It will be harder for them to down-regulate their automated stress reactions and heal• They won't be safe for their families and loved ones people to be around • Ours will not be a safe world
So bravo, we went to war to create safety, and look what came back.
Until we can admit all of this, how can we help troubled people in the military? Or for that matter, find safety as civilians.
The good Major had never been in any combat and since he was an Army Major and a Psychiatrist it is doubtful he ever would. I have been in combat and am not afraid to talk about my experiences to anyone who would care to listen but most people who have never been in combat want to hear what it is like. At the same time I have never felt a need to pick up a weapon and gun down unarmed civilians but I am also not an ISLAMIC JEHADIST.